Do you find it better for companies adopting master data management to go with an enterprise-wide MDM implementation or deploy it departmentally? Or does it not really matter?
I have two answers to that question.
First answer: I find it better to implement MDM enterprise-wide. That’s where companies get the biggest bang for their buck. Reconcile product data across diverse product catalogs and all of your suppliers? Golden!
Second answer: No one does that. Or at least, no one starts out that way. MDM projects typically start one system and one business problem at a time, and then branch out. Unlike business intelligence (BI) projects, where you’re usually developing successive BI applications, with MDM you’re progressively bringing on board new systems that need access to master data. So, truth be told, we’re slouching toward master data management one system at a time.
In both cases, the sooner you start, the faster you’ll succeed. Profound, huh?
Dig Deeper on MDM best practices
Related Q&A from Jill Dyché
What’s the biggest BI problem companies keep running into? Overloading data at the expense of functionality, says an expert. Find out how to avoid ... Continue Reading
There’s a lot of confusion about agile business intelligence (BI). Get an expert’s take on what agile BI really is and if it’s a valid BI development... Continue Reading
Are some companies primed to get more use out of social media analytics than others are? Find out, plus learn how a social media analytics strategy ... Continue Reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.