Home > Data management / BI News > BI better bought than built, study says
Data management / BI News:
EMAIL THIS

BI better bought than built, study says

By Hannah Smalltree, News Writer
05 Jan 2006 | SearchDataManagement.com

News on data management trends and technology
Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us    Add to Google

Add to My Yahoo!

Add to Google

Business users and IT are uniting over vendor-developed business intelligence (BI) tools, according to a recent study.

The streamlined implementation, reduced custom development costs and simplified data integration of vendor tools appeals to IT, while business users appreciate the shorter "time to first use" and functions like self-service reporting. This is all contributing to a growing trend toward vendor-developed BI tools, said the study by San Mateo-Calif.-based Ventana Research.

Ventana interviewed employees at 437 companies with over $100 million in revenue, with 73% of the respondents coming from IT and 26% from business departments. Most were already supporters of vendor-developed BI, with 90% of those surveyed reported having already implemented "one or more" tools. Siebel Systems Inc., a CRM and analytics vendor based in San Mateo, Calif., was one of the study's sponsors. Eric Rogge, vice president and research director with Ventana, said the study and its conclusions were determined independently.

For more information

Read a recent ranking of BI vendors

 

CIO's 2006 to-do lists include BI

 

Read an Oracle BI case study

 

No BI tools for RFID?

 

While BI initiatives in the past were often custom, in-house development projects, trends like organization-wide BI deployments, more mature products from BI vendors, tighter integration with other business applications and smaller budgets for custom development are driving companies to invest in commercial products.

"With custom development, best practices are earned the hard way," Rogge said. "We're midway through a trend to off the rack BI. CIOs are realizing that they can't do everything."

Custom development may still be necessary for more sophisticated BI needs, but companies are finding that vendor-developed applications are a benefit for more "commoditized" customer-facing processes, Rogge said. The study found that 45% of respondents would be further investing in commercial BI applications, while only 15% said they would not.

Respondents reported that these applications have become a key tool for many companies, with catchy names like "STRIKE" or "PEAK," and prominent places on the desktop. Everyone was a fan of functions like self-service reporting, providing business users with the information they need without having to call on IT. Business users listed the primary information benefit of the tools as "access to previously inaccessible data," while the second most important benefit was "timely access to data." Not surprisingly, the desire for near real-time reporting is driving businesses to customize the commercial applications. Respondents reported that enhancements frequently included replacing static reports with parameterized reporting, creating reusable report templates and creating ad-hoc reporting environments.

IT groups said a key advantage of vendor-developed tools is simplified data integration across applications, noting features like master data management. But despite a more streamlined integration process enabled by vendor-developed tools, data integration is time consuming no matter how you do it, Rogge said.

While the vendor's tools may be comparatively faster to implement, respondents said their No. 1 gripe was deployment time, reporting that the "time to first use" often took longer than one year. Other areas of dissatisfaction were insufficient interactivity, slow queries and data integration difficulties.

These complaints support one of Ventana's recommendations to standardize BI applications, not just platforms. Different BI applications can have different metric definitions, metadata and report structures, which can complicate BI implementations. Standardizing BI applications will mitigate that problem, while standardizing on a platform alone will not, Rogge said.

Another one of Rogge's recommendations is to go for the "low-hanging fruit," when deploying BI applications, starting with finance, sales and customer support.

"There's a lot more precedence and experience in these areas," Rogge said. "BI applications are all about improving front-line efficiencies … it's all about the customer and enabling daily decisions about how to make service better."

Tags: Business intelligence technology platformBI BulletinPlanningVIEW ALL TAGS

Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us    Add to Google



RELATED CONTENT
Business intelligence technology platform
BI project management tips for implementation success
Oracle, SAP and IBM top Forrester's corporate performance management rankings
Microsoft details self-service business intelligence, data warehouse releases
Birst takes SaaS BI out of the cloud, battles data security fears
Hurdles for SaaS BI vendors include data integration, low recognition
IBM launches private analytics cloud
Atlanta YMCA turns to SaaS BI software over 'complicated' Cognos
Choosing BI software: Use your ERP vendor or go with third-party BI?
Data integration for Software as a Service business intelligence software evolves
SAP inks another partnership to enhance NetWeaver BW

BI Bulletin
Trends and tips for using business intelligence and analytics in retail
Trends and tips for using business intelligence in financial services
Business intelligence project management: Five must-have pieces of advice
Gartner data warehouse DBMS Magic Quadrant 2007: New tools, old mantras
Performance management trends, with Howard Dresner
Business intelligence and corporate performance management software: Build vs. buy
Excel in enterprises: How to deal with data integrity
Enterprise search software enables AMR's analysis
IBM looks to the future of business intelligence
Job scheduling software helps hospital's BI operate

Planning
Business intelligence project management: Five must-have pieces of advice
Business intelligence ROI: Five keys to justifying BI investments
Common business intelligence (BI) mistakes
Business intelligence software: Invest now or wait?
Business intelligence software deployments: Seven fatal flaws to avoid
The savvy manager's guide to business intelligence: Making the business case for BI
Expensive data warehouses not always necessary for BI
Business intelligence roadmap: Project planning
Data warehousing strategy: Is training necessary?
The secret to BI success

RELATED GLOSSARY TERMS
Terms from Whatis.com − the technology online dictionary
corporate performance management  (SearchDataManagement.com)

RELATED RESOURCES
2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary



Data Management: Business Intelligence, Data Integration, Data Compliance
About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
SEARCH 
TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2005 - 2009, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts