Implementing data quality software but ignoring governance policies

Implementing data quality software but ignoring governance policies

Is there any situation you can think of when it would be fine to implement data quality software but not work on your data governance policies or processes?

    Requires Free Membership to View

    When you register, you'll begin receiving targeted emails from my team of award-winning writers. Our goal is to keep you informed on the hottest data and information management trends today.

    Hannah Smalltree, Editorial Director

    By submitting your registration information to SearchDataManagement.com you agree to receive email communications from TechTarget and TechTarget partners. We encourage you to read our Privacy Policy which contains important disclosures about how we collect and use your registration and other information. If you reside outside of the United States, by submitting this registration information you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Your use of SearchDataManagement.com is governed by our Terms of Use. You may contact us at webmaster@TechTarget.com.

Sure. For example, when the data quality software addresses a problem where there is no way to control the creation of the data and the team tasked with implementing it is accountable for the results. There is no need for additional overhead in that case.

One such situation might involve data standardization and correction for the mailing of marketing materials. The problem may be localized to a specific division that doesn’t control the data creation process, and applying the required data quality fix is self-contained.

At any point where there is an impact on another group, or where the organization can benefit from eliminating the root cause of a data quality problem instead of simply fixing the resulting issues, you might want to reconsider your data governance policies.

This was first published in February 2011